首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing a model of short-term integrated palliative and supportive care for frail older people in community settings: perspectives of older people, carers and other key stakeholders
【2h】

Developing a model of short-term integrated palliative and supportive care for frail older people in community settings: perspectives of older people, carers and other key stakeholders

机译:为社区环境中体弱的老年人建立短期综合姑息和支持性护理模式:老年人,护理人员和其他主要利益相关者的观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Understanding how best to provide palliative care for frail older people with non-malignant conditions is an international priority. We aimed to develop a community-based episodic model of short-term integrated palliative and supportive care (SIPS) based on the views of service users and other key stakeholders in the United Kingdom.\ud\udMethod: Transparent expert consultations with health professionals, voluntary sector and carer representatives including a consensus survey; and focus groups with older people and carers were used to generate recommendations for the SIPS model. Discussions focused on three key components of the model: potential benefit of SIPS; timing of delivery; and processes of integrated working between specialist palliative care and generalist practitioners. Content and descriptive analysis was employed and findings integrated across the data sources. \ud\udFindings: We conducted two expert consultations (n=63), a consensus survey (n=42) and three focus groups (n=17). Potential benefits of SIPS included holistic assessment, opportunity for end of life discussion, symptom management, and carer reassurance. Older people and carers advocated early access to SIPS, while other stakeholders proposed delivery based on complex symptom burden. A priority for integrated working was the assignment of a key worker to coordinate care, but the assignment criteria remain uncertain.\ud\udInterpretation: Key stakeholders agree that a model of SIPS for frail older people with non-malignant conditions has potential benefits within community settings, but differ in opinion on the optimal timing and indications for this service. Our findings highlight the importance of consulting all key stakeholders in model development prior to feasibility evaluation.
机译:背景:了解如何最好地为患有非恶性疾病的体弱的老年人提供姑息治疗是一项国际优先事项。我们旨在根据英国服务使用者和其他主要利益相关者的观点,开发基于社区的短期综合姑息和支持治疗(SIPS)的事件模型。\ ud \ ud方法:与卫生专业人员进行透明的专家咨询,志愿部门和护理人员代表,包括共识调查;以及与老年人和照料者组成的焦点小组被用来为SIPS模型提供建议。讨论集中在模型的三个关键组成部分:SIPS的潜在利益;交货时间;以及姑息治疗专家和通才医生之间的整合工作流程。使用内容和描述性分析,并将发现结果整合到整个数据源中。 \ ud \ ud结果:我们进行了两次专家咨询(n = 63),一次共识调查(n = 42)和三个焦点小组(n = 17)。 SIPS的潜在好处包括整体评估,生命周期讨论的机会,症状管理和照料者的放心。老年人和护理人员主张尽早使用SIPS,而其他利益相关者则建议根据复杂的症状负担进行分娩。综合工作的优先事项是分配关键工作人员来协调医疗服务,但是分配标准仍然不确定。\ ud \ ud解释:关键利益相关者同意,针对患有非恶性疾病的脆弱老年人的SIPS模型在社区内具有潜在的好处设置,但对于此服务的最佳时间安排和指示意见不一。我们的研究结果突出了在可行性评估之前咨询模型开发中所有关键利益相关者的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号